Arc Pro A30M vs RTX A400

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Intel Arc Pro A30M

4 GB 50

5,862

0.0%

5,983

+2.1%

GeForce GTX 590

GeForce GTX 570

GeForce GTX 580

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Why buy it

✅68.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $135 MSRP).

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Intel Arc Pro A30M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

✅68.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $135 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Intel Arc Pro A30M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A400 better than Intel Arc Pro A30M?

Yes. RTX A400 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 2.1% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2024 instead of 2022, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX A400 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. RTX A400 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $135 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Intel Arc Pro A30M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Intel Arc Pro A30M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if RTX A400 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel Arc Pro A30M Benchmark Check

RTX A400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	RTX A400
1080p
low	101 FPS	36 FPS
medium	90 FPS	25 FPS
high	76 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	92 FPS	29 FPS
medium	78 FPS	18 FPS
high	65 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	46 FPS	10 FPS
medium	43 FPS	7 FPS
high	31 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	3 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open RTX A400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	RTX A400
1080p
low	143 FPS	73 FPS
medium	105 FPS	48 FPS
high	74 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	22 FPS
1440p
low	92 FPS	46 FPS
medium	61 FPS	25 FPS
high	46 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	14 FPS
4K
low	42 FPS	23 FPS
medium	31 FPS	14 FPS
high	25 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	8 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open RTX A400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	RTX A400
1080p
low	264 FPS	269 FPS
medium	211 FPS	215 FPS
high	176 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	198 FPS	202 FPS
medium	158 FPS	162 FPS
high	132 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	132 FPS	126 FPS
medium	106 FPS	108 FPS
high	86 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	55 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open RTX A400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	RTX A400
1080p
low	264 FPS	147 FPS
medium	211 FPS	117 FPS
high	176 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	79 FPS
1440p
low	198 FPS	108 FPS
medium	158 FPS	87 FPS
high	132 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	100 FPS	63 FPS
medium	77 FPS	50 FPS
high	67 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	29 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open RTX A400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A30M and RTX A400

Intel Arc Pro A30M

The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

RTX A400

The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 5,862 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is built on Generation 12.7 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 6 (RTX A400) vs 24.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	RTX A400
G3D Mark Score	5,862	5,983+2%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Ampere
Process Node	6 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1024+33%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.096 TFLOPS+51%	2.706 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2000 MHz+14%	1762 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+167%	24
Ray Tracing Cores	8+33%	6

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A400 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro A30M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	RTX A400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	RTX A400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro A30M draws 50W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 0% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.