Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Intel Arc Pro A30M

4 GB 50

5,862

0.0%

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

4 GB 100

6,012

+2.6%

Radeon RX 560X

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

2022

Why buy it

✅47.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅47.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS better than Intel Arc Pro A30M?

Yes. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 47.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $600 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 47.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Intel Arc Pro A30M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Intel Arc Pro A30M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel Arc Pro A30M Benchmark Check

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
1080p
low	101 FPS	126 FPS
medium	90 FPS	113 FPS
high	76 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	92 FPS	108 FPS
medium	78 FPS	92 FPS
high	65 FPS	80 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	46 FPS	58 FPS
medium	43 FPS	52 FPS
high	31 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	40 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
1080p
low	143 FPS	271 FPS
medium	105 FPS	216 FPS
high	74 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	92 FPS	179 FPS
medium	61 FPS	148 FPS
high	46 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	95 FPS
4K
low	42 FPS	96 FPS
medium	31 FPS	79 FPS
high	25 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	51 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
1080p
low	264 FPS	271 FPS
medium	211 FPS	216 FPS
high	176 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	198 FPS	203 FPS
medium	158 FPS	162 FPS
high	132 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	132 FPS	135 FPS
medium	106 FPS	108 FPS
high	86 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	68 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
1080p
low	264 FPS	271 FPS
medium	211 FPS	216 FPS
high	176 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	198 FPS	203 FPS
medium	158 FPS	162 FPS
high	132 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	100 FPS	129 FPS
medium	77 FPS	102 FPS
high	67 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	68 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A30M and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Intel Arc Pro A30M

The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 5,862 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2100 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 32 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS).

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
G3D Mark Score	5,862	6,012+3%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1024	2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.096 TFLOPS	8.602 TFLOPS+110%
Boost Clock	2000 MHz	2100 MHz+5%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	128+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	8	32+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro A30M draws 50W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.