Intel Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon RX 5500M

Intel

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 5500M

2019Core: 1375 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.
  • βœ…More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022βˆ’2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).

Radeon RX 5500M

2019

Why buy it

  • βœ…Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).

Trade-offs

  • ❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 5500M better than Intel Arc Pro A30M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,862 vs 5,954 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon RX 5500M is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Intel Arc Pro A30M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation, and a 6nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon RX 5500M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Radeon RX 5500M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon RX 5500M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.6% higher G3D Mark. Intel Arc Pro A30M is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 85W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Intel Arc Pro A30M make more sense than Radeon RX 5500M?
Yes. Intel Arc Pro A30M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 85W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX 5500M. The trade-off is that Radeon RX 5500M currently gives you 1.6% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetIntel Arc Pro A30MRadeon RX 5500M
1080p
low101 FPS117 FPS
medium90 FPS105 FPS
high76 FPS85 FPS
ultra63 FPS63 FPS
1440p
low92 FPS109 FPS
medium78 FPS94 FPS
high65 FPS73 FPS
ultra54 FPS55 FPS
4K
low46 FPS46 FPS
medium43 FPS43 FPS
high31 FPS30 FPS
ultra27 FPS26 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetIntel Arc Pro A30MRadeon RX 5500M
1080p
low143 FPS132 FPS
medium105 FPS98 FPS
high74 FPS70 FPS
ultra49 FPS46 FPS
1440p
low92 FPS86 FPS
medium61 FPS58 FPS
high46 FPS43 FPS
ultra34 FPS32 FPS
4K
low42 FPS39 FPS
medium31 FPS28 FPS
high25 FPS23 FPS
ultra19 FPS17 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetIntel Arc Pro A30MRadeon RX 5500M
1080p
low264 FPS268 FPS
medium211 FPS214 FPS
high176 FPS179 FPS
ultra132 FPS134 FPS
1440p
low198 FPS201 FPS
medium158 FPS161 FPS
high132 FPS134 FPS
ultra99 FPS100 FPS
4K
low132 FPS134 FPS
medium106 FPS107 FPS
high86 FPS89 FPS
ultra60 FPS67 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetIntel Arc Pro A30MRadeon RX 5500M
1080p
low264 FPS268 FPS
medium211 FPS214 FPS
high176 FPS179 FPS
ultra132 FPS134 FPS
1440p
low198 FPS201 FPS
medium158 FPS161 FPS
high132 FPS134 FPS
ultra99 FPS100 FPS
4K
low100 FPS103 FPS
medium77 FPS80 FPS
high67 FPS70 FPS
ultra54 FPS56 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A30M and Radeon RX 5500M

Intel

Intel Arc Pro A30M

The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 5500M

The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 5,862 and the Radeon RX 5500M reaches 5,954 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A30MRadeon RX 5500M
G3D Mark Score
5,862
5,954+2%
Architecture
Generation 12.7
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
6 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1024
1408+38%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.096 TFLOPS
4.632 TFLOPS+13%
Boost Clock
2000 MHz+22%
1645 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
88+38%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro A30M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A30MRadeon RX 5500M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) β€” the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A30MRadeon RX 5500M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
System
224 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro A30M draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W β€” a 51.9% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A30MRadeon RX 5500M
TDP
50W-41%
85W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
β€”
0mm
Slots
β€”
0
Temp (Load)
β€”
75Β°C
Perf/Watt
117.2+67%
70.0