
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Why buy it
- β Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022β2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- β70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- β Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022β2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- β70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5500M better than Intel Arc Pro A30M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro A30M make more sense than Radeon RX 5500M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro A30M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro A30M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro A30M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 67 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro A30M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A30M and Radeon RX 5500M

Intel Arc Pro A30M
Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 5,862 and the Radeon RX 5500M reaches 5,954 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,862 | 5,954+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1408+38% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+22% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 88+38% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro A30M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) β the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A30M draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W β a 51.9% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-41% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | β | 0mm |
| Slots | β | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | β | 75Β°C |
| Perf/Watt | 117.2+67% | 70.0 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













