GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs RTXA5000-8Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅+141.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $2,251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2328.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

RTXA5000-8Q

2021

Why buy it

✅220% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 80).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,916 vs 11,892).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
904% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

RTXA5000-8Q

2021

Why buy it

✅+141.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $2,251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2328.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅220% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 80).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,916 vs 11,892).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
904% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than RTXA5000-8Q?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 11,892 vs 4,916 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while RTXA5000-8Q is a 2021 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2021, 141.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is about $2,251 cheaper on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $2,500 MSRP, and you are getting 141.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 2328.8%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is RTXA5000-8Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. RTXA5000-8Q is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,500 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

RTXA5000-8Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RTXA5000-8Q
1080p
low	130 FPS	136 FPS
medium	113 FPS	116 FPS
high	99 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	107 FPS
medium	96 FPS	89 FPS
high	81 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	39 FPS
medium	57 FPS	35 FPS
high	39 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open RTXA5000-8Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RTXA5000-8Q
1080p
low	239 FPS	221 FPS
medium	206 FPS	177 FPS
high	164 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	161 FPS
medium	135 FPS	125 FPS
high	112 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	77 FPS
medium	74 FPS	63 FPS
high	62 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open RTXA5000-8Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RTXA5000-8Q
1080p
low	535 FPS	221 FPS
medium	428 FPS	177 FPS
high	357 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	166 FPS
medium	321 FPS	133 FPS
high	268 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	111 FPS
medium	214 FPS	88 FPS
high	178 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open RTXA5000-8Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RTXA5000-8Q
1080p
low	467 FPS	214 FPS
medium	414 FPS	175 FPS
high	335 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	151 FPS
medium	321 FPS	128 FPS
high	236 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	87 FPS
medium	175 FPS	72 FPS
high	150 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	44 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open RTXA5000-8Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RTXA5000-8Q

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RTXA5000-8Q

The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 4,916 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 141.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RTXA5000-8Q uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-8Q). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 64 (RTXA5000-8Q) with 80 Tensor cores vs 256.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RTXA5000-8Q
G3D Mark Score	11,892+142%	4,916
Architecture	Ampere	Ampere
Process Node	8 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2560	8192+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS+209%
Boost Clock	1755 MHz+4%	1695 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	80	256+220%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB	8 MB+220%
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%
Ray Tracing Cores	20	64+220%
Tensor Cores	80	256+220%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTXA5000-8Q supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RTXA5000-8Q
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-8Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-8Q) — the RTXA5000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RTXA5000-8Q
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 230W — a 55.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (RTXA5000-8Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RTXA5000-8Q
TDP	130W-43%	230W
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	235mm	—
Height	124mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	91.5+328%	21.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTXA5000-8Q launched at $2500. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 90% less ($2251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 2290% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).