
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 218% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition across 17 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅63.6% more average FPS across 17 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅250% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 80).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌702.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 218% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅63.6% more average FPS across 17 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅250% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 80).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition across 17 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌702.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 217 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 80 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 30,020 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition leads by 152.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1432 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) with 80 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 30,020+152% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 8960+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 25.66 TFLOPS+186% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+23% | 1432 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 280+250% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 8.8 MB+252% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 70+250% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 280+250% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 70W — a 60% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 70W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 167mm |
| Height | 124mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 72°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 428.9+369% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 87.5% less ($1750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 15.0 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 218.7% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-88% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+219% | 15.0 |
| Codename | GA106 | GB203 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #224 | #17 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













