RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs RTX A5500

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023Core: 720 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX A5500

2022Core: 1080 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
  • Delivers 76.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.3 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 70W instead of 230W, a 160W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

RTX A5500

2022

Why buy it

  • 73.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 66.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 192).
  • 1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 80.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,600 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • 228.6% higher power demand at 230W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A5500 better than RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation?
Yes. RTX A5500 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 73.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 2.1% higher PassMark G3D performance, 320 vs 192 Tensor cores, and 24 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2022 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
RTX A5500 is about 80.1% more expensive on MSRP at $3,600 MSRP versus $1,999 MSRP, and you are getting 73.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.1% higher G3D Mark. RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX A5500 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation make more sense than RTX A5500?
Yes. RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 230W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $1,999 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX A5500. The trade-off is that RTX A5500 currently gives you 2.1% higher G3D Mark and 73.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A5500
1080p
low102 FPS213 FPS
medium87 FPS188 FPS
high70 FPS157 FPS
ultra48 FPS110 FPS
1440p
low81 FPS193 FPS
medium68 FPS162 FPS
high49 FPS117 FPS
ultra33 FPS81 FPS
4K
low33 FPS98 FPS
medium30 FPS83 FPS
high22 FPS56 FPS
ultra20 FPS48 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A5500
1080p
low268 FPS524 FPS
medium213 FPS458 FPS
high171 FPS358 FPS
ultra148 FPS314 FPS
1440p
low198 FPS409 FPS
medium151 FPS349 FPS
high123 FPS270 FPS
ultra100 FPS226 FPS
4K
low91 FPS213 FPS
medium72 FPS181 FPS
high62 FPS150 FPS
ultra48 FPS124 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A5500
1080p
low465 FPS894 FPS
medium404 FPS726 FPS
high341 FPS631 FPS
ultra288 FPS475 FPS
1440p
low339 FPS700 FPS
medium295 FPS564 FPS
high256 FPS475 FPS
ultra208 FPS356 FPS
4K
low229 FPS475 FPS
medium192 FPS380 FPS
high150 FPS317 FPS
ultra113 FPS237 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A5500
1080p
low166 FPS354 FPS
medium136 FPS316 FPS
high117 FPS278 FPS
ultra100 FPS238 FPS
1440p
low121 FPS270 FPS
medium102 FPS247 FPS
high89 FPS213 FPS
ultra75 FPS179 FPS
4K
low73 FPS176 FPS
medium61 FPS154 FPS
high48 FPS118 FPS
ultra37 FPS95 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and RTX A5500

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A5500

The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.

Graphics Performance

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 20,669 and the RTX A5500 reaches 21,108 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 80 (RTX A5500) with 192 Tensor cores vs 320.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A5500
G3D Mark Score
20,669
21,108+2%
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ampere
Process Node
5 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
6144
10240+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
19.17 TFLOPS
34.1 TFLOPS+78%
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1665 MHz+7%
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
192
320+67%
L1 Cache
6 MB
10 MB+67%
L2 Cache
48 MB+700%
6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
48
80+67%
Tensor Cores
192
320+67%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A5500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A5500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A5500
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 has 24 GB. The RTX A5500 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 174.3% advantage for the RTX A5500. Bus width: 160-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 6 MB (RTX A5500) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A5500
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
24 GB+1100%
Memory Type
GDDR6 ECC
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
280 GB/s
768 GB/s+174%
Bus Width
160-bit
384-bit+140%
L2 Cache
48 MB+700%
6 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A5500
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A5500
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
7th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation draws 70W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 106.7% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A5500
TDP
70W-70%
230W
Recommended PSU
750W
450W-40%
Power Connector
1x 8-pin
8-pin
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
295.3+222%
91.8
💰

Value Analysis

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999 MSRP, while the RTX A5500 launched at $3600. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation costs 44.5% less ($1601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 5.9 (RTX A5500) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation offers 74.6% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).

FeatureRTX 4000 SFF Ada GenerationRTX A5500
MSRP
$1999-44%
$3600
Performance per Dollar
10.3+75%
5.9
Codename
AD104
GA102
Release
March 21 2023
March 22 2022
Ranking
#71
#67