
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,601 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 267.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 11 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A5500 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅15.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅118.2% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 11 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌260.4% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,601 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 267.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅15.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅118.2% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 11 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 11 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A5500 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌260.4% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2080 Ti better than RTX A5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A5500 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 866 FPS | 894 FPS |
| medium | 703 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 237 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 534 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and RTX A5500

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,513 points. Launch price was $999.

RTX A5500
RTX A5500
The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti scores 21,513 and the RTX A5500 reaches 21,108 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is built on Turing while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 13.45 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 68 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 80 (RTX A5500) with 544 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 21,513+2% | 21,108 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 10240+135% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.45 TFLOPS | 34.1 TFLOPS+154% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 1665 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 88 | 96+9% |
| TMUs | 272 | 320+18% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 10 MB+133% |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 6 MB+9% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 68 | 80+18% |
| Tensor Cores | 544+70% | 320 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A5500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti comes with 11 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 has 24 GB. The RTX A5500 offers 118.2% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 616 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 24.7% advantage for the RTX A5500. Bus width: 352-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 5.5 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 6 MB (RTX A5500) — the RTX A5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 11 GB | 24 GB+118% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 616 GB/s | 768 GB/s+25% |
| Bus Width | 352-bit | 384-bit+9% |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 6 MB+9% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti draws 250W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 8.3% difference. The RTX A5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 230W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 116mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.1 | 91.8+7% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti launched at $999 MSRP, while the RTX A5500 launched at $3600. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti costs 72.3% less ($2601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 5.9 (RTX A5500) — the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti offers 264.4% better value. The RTX A5500 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-72% | $3600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5+264% | 5.9 |
| Codename | TU102 | GA102 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #66 | #67 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












