
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅134.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (544 vs 232).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 110W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 250W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (232 vs 544), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅134.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (544 vs 232).
Why buy it
- ✅2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 250W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (232 vs 544), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile better than GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2080 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 108 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 866 FPS | 870 FPS |
| medium | 703 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 459 FPS |
| medium | 534 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 340 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 163 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,513 points. Launch price was $999.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti scores 21,513 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 22,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is built on Turing while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 13.45 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 68 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 58 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 544 Tensor cores vs 232.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 21,513 | 22,167+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 7424+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.45 TFLOPS | 24.72 TFLOPS+84% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 1665 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 88+10% | 80 |
| TMUs | 272+17% | 232 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 7.3 MB+70% |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 48 MB+773% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 68+17% | 58 |
| Tensor Cores | 544+134% | 232 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti comes with 11 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has 12 GB. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile offers 9.1% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 616 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 42.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. Bus width: 352-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 5.5 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 11 GB | 12 GB+9% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 616 GB/s+43% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 352-bit+83% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 48 MB+773% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti draws 250W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 110W — a 77.8% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 110W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 150W-77% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 116mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.1 | 201.5+134% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Codename | TU102 | AD104 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #66 | #64 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












