
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018Why buy it
- ✅5.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅277.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (544 vs 144).
- ✅37.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (11 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌117.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 250W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2080 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 11 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (144 vs 544), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅5.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅277.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (544 vs 144).
- ✅37.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (11 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 250W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌117.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2080 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 11 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (144 vs 544), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2080 Ti better than GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 866 FPS | 811 FPS |
| medium | 703 FPS | 661 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 466 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 206 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 534 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 435 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 233 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,513 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,702 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti scores 21,513 and the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile reaches 20,702 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 4,608 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile). Raw compute: 13.45 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 15.62 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 68 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 36 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) with 544 Tensor cores vs 144.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 21,513+4% | 20,702 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 4608+6% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.45 TFLOPS | 15.62 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 1695 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 88+83% | 48 |
| TMUs | 272+89% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 4.5 MB+5% |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 32 MB+482% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 68+89% | 36 |
| Tensor Cores | 544+278% | 144 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti comes with 11 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti offers 37.5% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 616 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) — a 140.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. Bus width: 352-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 5.5 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 11 GB+38% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 616 GB/s+141% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 352-bit+175% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 32 MB+482% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile's 115W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 115W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 116mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.1 | 180.0+109% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Codename | TU102 | AD106 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #66 | #83 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












