
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅183.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (544 vs 192).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 110W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 250W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 544), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅183.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (544 vs 192).
Why buy it
- ✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 250W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 110W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 544), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2080 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 866 FPS | 845 FPS |
| medium | 703 FPS | 692 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 534 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 492 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 249 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,513 points. Launch price was $999.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,119 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti scores 21,513 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 22,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is built on Turing while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 13.45 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 68 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 544 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 21,513 | 22,119+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 6144+41% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.45 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+99% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 1665 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 88+38% | 64 |
| TMUs | 272+42% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 6 MB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 48 MB+773% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 68+42% | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 544+183% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti comes with 11 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU offers 9.1% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 616 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 42.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. Bus width: 352-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 5.5 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 11 GB | 12 GB+9% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 616 GB/s+43% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 352-bit+83% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 48 MB+773% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs AV1,H.265,H.264 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | AV1,H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti draws 250W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 110W — a 77.8% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 110W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 150W-77% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 116mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 86.1 | 201.1+134% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Codename | TU102 | AD104 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #66 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












