G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,550 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 325.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

RTX A4500

2021

Why buy it

✅95.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
1040.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,699 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

RTX A4500

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,550 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 325.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅95.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
1040.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,699 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A4500 better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. RTX A4500 is clearly the better overall GPU here. RTX A4500 averages 95.2% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 21,094 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX A4500 is a 2021 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A4500 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019, 168.1% more raw performance headroom, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That extra performance headroom should help it hold higher settings and newer game demands for longer.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX A4500 is about 1040.3% more expensive on MSRP at $1,699 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 95.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 168.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX A4500 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, RTX A4500 earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

RTX A4500 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
1080p
low	94 FPS	104 FPS
medium	83 FPS	88 FPS
high	70 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	51 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	82 FPS
medium	74 FPS	68 FPS
high	60 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	35 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	34 FPS
medium	39 FPS	31 FPS
high	27 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	20 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTX A4500

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
1080p
low	136 FPS	441 FPS
medium	113 FPS	377 FPS
high	94 FPS	299 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	260 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	332 FPS
medium	62 FPS	276 FPS
high	44 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	184 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	166 FPS
medium	27 FPS	140 FPS
high	21 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	96 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTX A4500

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
1080p
low	323 FPS	564 FPS
medium	283 FPS	477 FPS
high	205 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	339 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	442 FPS
medium	202 FPS	372 FPS
high	151 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	260 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	287 FPS
medium	117 FPS	237 FPS
high	79 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	149 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTX A4500

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
1080p
low	261 FPS	174 FPS
medium	211 FPS	144 FPS
high	191 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	128 FPS
medium	158 FPS	109 FPS
high	135 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	75 FPS
medium	74 FPS	63 FPS
high	65 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTX A4500

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX A4500

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX A4500

The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX A4500's 21,094 — the RTX A4500 leads by 168.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
G3D Mark Score	7,869	21,094+168%
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	896	7168+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	23.65 TFLOPS+693%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1650 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	224+300%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	7 MB+695%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 250% advantage for the RTX A4500. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	448 GB/s+250%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	7th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
TDP	75W-63%	200W
Recommended PSU	300W-33%	450W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	105.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 91.2% less ($1550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.4 (RTX A4500) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 325.8% better value. The RTX A4500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).