
Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:

RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅1.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
- ❌61.7% longer card at 270mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 270mm, a 103mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌18.5% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.6 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5700
2019RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅1.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 270mm, a 103mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
- ❌61.7% longer card at 270mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌18.5% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.6 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700 better than RTX A2000 12GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A2000 12GB make more sense than Radeon RX 5700?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 322 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700 and RTX A2000 12GB

Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX A2000 12GB
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700 scores 14,296 and the RTX A2000 12GB reaches 13,721 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,296+4% | 13,721 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3328+44% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.949 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+44% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+38% | 104 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A2000 12GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A2000 12GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the Radeon RX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700 draws 180W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 88% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 5700) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 270mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 70W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 270mm | 167mm |
| Height | 110mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 79.4 | 196.0+147% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449. The Radeon RX 5700 costs 15.6% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 30.6 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the Radeon RX 5700 offers 23.2% better value. The RTX A2000 12GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-16% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.7+23% | 30.6 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GA106 |
| Release | July 7 2019 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #167 | #177 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













