
Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 123% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
- ❌61.7% longer card at 270mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅37.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 270mm, a 103mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌124% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5700
2019RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 123% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅37.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 270mm, a 103mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
- ❌61.7% longer card at 270mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌124% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell better than Radeon RX 5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 322 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 76 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700 scores 14,296 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell reaches 14,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1957 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,296 | 14,363 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4352+89% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.949 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS+114% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1957 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+6% | 136 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5700 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700 draws 180W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 88% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 5700) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 270mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 70W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 270mm | 167mm |
| Height | 110mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 79.4 | 205.2+158% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. The Radeon RX 5700 costs 55.4% less ($470 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the Radeon RX 5700 offers 123.1% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-55% | $849 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.7+123% | 16.9 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GB206 |
| Release | July 7 2019 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #167 | #165 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













