
Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $621 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 169.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅34.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌163.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5700
2019RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $621 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 169.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅34.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌163.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700 better than RadeonT RX 6850M XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RadeonT RX 6850M XT make more sense than Radeon RX 5700?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 322 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 157 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700 and RadeonT RX 6850M XT

Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700 scores 14,296 and the RadeonT RX 6850M XT reaches 13,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Raw compute: 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,296+2% | 13,992 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.949 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS+66% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2581 MHz+50% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5700 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT has 12 GB. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) vs 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the Radeon RX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700 draws 180W versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 165W — a 8.7% difference. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 5700) vs 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 270mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 165W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 270mm | 0mm |
| Height | 110mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 79.4 | 84.8+7% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379 MSRP, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000. The Radeon RX 5700 costs 62.1% less ($621 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 14.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the Radeon RX 5700 offers 169.3% better value. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-62% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.7+169% | 14.0 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 22 |
| Release | July 7 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #167 | #103 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













