
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Popular choices:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1095.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (224 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅19.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅153.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 224).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1035.1% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1095.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅19.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅153.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 224).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (224 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1035.1% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER better than RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX 6000 Ada Generation still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 477 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 607 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 194 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 711 FPS | 340 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 695 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 576 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and RTX 6000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 29,958 versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 28,454 — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER leads by 5.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 56 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) with 224 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,958+5% | 28,454 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7168 | 18176+154% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.48 TFLOPS | 91.06 TFLOPS+157% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2505 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 80 | 192+140% |
| TMUs | 224 | 568+154% |
| L1 Cache | 7 MB | 17.8 MB+154% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 56 | 142+154% |
| Tensor Cores | 224 | 568+154% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 6000 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 48 GB. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 90.5% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 960 GB/s+90% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER draws 220W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 16-pin. Card length: 245mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-27% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 16-pin |
| Length | 245mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 136.2+44% | 94.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER launched at $599 MSRP, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER costs 91.2% less ($6200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.0 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 1090.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-91% | $6799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.0+1090% | 4.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | AD102 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | December 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #18 | #24 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












