
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Popular choices:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 560.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 245mm instead of 267mm, a 22mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (224 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅15.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅78.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 224).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌567.8% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 560.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 245mm instead of 267mm, a 22mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅15.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅78.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 224).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (224 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌567.8% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 5000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER make more sense than RTX 5000 Ada Generation?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 53 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 583 FPS |
| medium | 477 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 911 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 748 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 674 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 435 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 711 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 695 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 576 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 101 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and RTX 5000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 29,958 and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation reaches 30,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 56 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) with 224 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,958 | 30,269+1% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7168 | 12800+79% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.48 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+84% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2550 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 80 | 176+120% |
| TMUs | 224 | 400+79% |
| L1 Cache | 7 MB | 12.5 MB+79% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 72 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 56 | 100+79% |
| Tensor Cores | 224 | 400+79% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — a 14.3% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 576 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 72 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER draws 220W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 16-pin. Card length: 245mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-12% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 16-pin |
| Length | 245mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 136.2+12% | 121.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER launched at $599 MSRP, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER costs 85% less ($3401 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.0 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 7.6 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 557.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-85% | $4000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.0+558% | 7.6 |
| Codename | AD104 | AD102 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #18 | #16 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












