
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 233% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (224 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
- ❌46.7% longer card at 245mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅25% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 224).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 245mm, a 78mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌233.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 233% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅25% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 224).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 245mm, a 78mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (224 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
- ❌46.7% longer card at 245mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌233.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER better than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 477 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 217 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 711 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 695 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 576 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 80 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 29,958 and the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition reaches 30,020 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Raw compute: 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1432 MHz. Ray tracing: 56 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) with 224 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,958 | 30,020 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7168 | 8960+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.48 TFLOPS+38% | 25.66 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+73% | 1432 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 224 | 280+25% |
| L1 Cache | 7 MB | 8.8 MB+26% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 56 | 70+25% |
| Tensor Cores | 224 | 280+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER draws 220W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 70W — a 103.4% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 245mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 70W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 245mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-3% | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 136.2 | 428.9+215% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER launched at $599 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER costs 70% less ($1400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.0 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 15.0 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 233.3% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-70% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.0+233% | 15.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | GB203 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #18 | #17 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












