
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Why buy it
- ✅19.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 224).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌233.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌104.5% higher power demand at 450W vs 220W.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 240.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 450W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (224 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅19.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 224).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 240.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 450W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌233.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌104.5% higher power demand at 450W vs 220W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (224 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER better than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3090 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 608 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 317 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 571 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 110 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 760 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 586 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 438 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 878 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 807 FPS | 711 FPS |
| high | 710 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 700 FPS | 695 FPS |
| medium | 640 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 560 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 466 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 331 FPS | 321 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti scores 29,395 and the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER reaches 29,958 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 56 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) with 336 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,395 | 29,958+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+50% | 7168 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40 TFLOPS+13% | 35.48 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1860 MHz | 2475 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 112+40% | 80 |
| TMUs | 336+50% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+50% | 7 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+50% | 56 |
| Tensor Cores | 336+50% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+100% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s+100% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti draws 450W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 220W — a 68.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 336mm vs 245mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 220W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 650W-24% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 336mm | 245mm |
| Height | 140mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 65.3 | 136.2+109% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER costs 70% less ($1400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 50.0 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 240.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $599-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 50.0+240% |
| Codename | GA102 | AD104 |
| Release | January 27 2022 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #19 | #18 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












