
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Why buy it
- ✅85.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 320).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌122.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ❌309.1% higher power demand at 450W vs 110W.
- ❌100+% longer card at 336mm vs 0mm.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,099 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 126.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 450W, a 340W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (320 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅85.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 320).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,099 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 126.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 450W, a 340W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌122.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ❌309.1% higher power demand at 450W vs 110W.
- ❌100+% longer card at 336mm vs 0mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (320 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3090 Ti better than Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 608 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 571 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 745 FPS |
| medium | 760 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 547 FPS |
| ultra | 586 FPS | 477 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 438 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 202 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 878 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 807 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 710 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 700 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 640 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 560 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 466 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 331 FPS | 58 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti scores 29,395 and the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) reaches 29,964 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) with 336 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,395 | 29,964+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+320% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40 TFLOPS+401% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1860 MHz+19% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 336+110% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+320% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+110% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 336+5% | 320 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti draws 450W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 121.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 16-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 336mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 110W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 650W-24% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 336mm | 0mm |
| Height | 140mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 65.3 | 272.4+317% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) costs 55% less ($1099 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 126.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $900-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 33.3+127% |
| Codename | GA102 | TU104 |
| Release | January 27 2022 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #19 | #201 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












