
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Why buy it
- ✅27.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 264).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅1.7% more average FPS across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 170.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (264 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅27.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 264).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅1.7% more average FPS across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 170.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (264 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER better than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3090 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 608 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 571 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 163 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 933 FPS |
| medium | 760 FPS | 752 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 586 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 438 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 878 FPS | 962 FPS |
| medium | 807 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 710 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 700 FPS | 753 FPS |
| medium | 640 FPS | 630 FPS |
| high | 560 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 483 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 466 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 331 FPS | 341 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti scores 29,395 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 31,828 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads by 8.3%. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 66 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) with 336 Tensor cores vs 264.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,395 | 31,828+8% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+27% | 8448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40 TFLOPS | 44.1 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1860 MHz | 2610 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 336+27% | 264 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+27% | 8.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+27% | 66 |
| Tensor Cores | 336+27% | 264 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+50% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s+50% | 672 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti draws 450W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 285W — a 44.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 336mm vs 310mm, occupying 3 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 285W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 750W-12% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 336mm | 310mm |
| Height | 140mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 72°C-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 65.3 | 111.7+71% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER costs 60% less ($1200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 170.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $799-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 39.8+171% |
| Codename | GA102 | AD103 |
| Release | January 27 2022 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #19 | #10 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












