
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅36% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (544 vs 400).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 11 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 175W.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅17.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅45.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 11 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 250W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (400 vs 544), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅36% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (544 vs 400).
Why buy it
- ✅17.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅45.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 11 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 250W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 11 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 175W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (400 vs 544), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU better than GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2080 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 187 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 866 FPS | 914 FPS |
| medium | 703 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 534 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 312 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,513 points. Launch price was $999.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti scores 21,513 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads by 5.9%. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is built on Turing while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 13.45 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 68 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 544 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 21,513+6% | 20,312 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 12800+194% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.45 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+385% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 2550 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 88 | 176+100% |
| TMUs | 272 | 400+47% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 12.5 MB+191% |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 72 MB+1209% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 68 | 100+47% |
| Tensor Cores | 544+36% | 400 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti comes with 11 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 16 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 45.5% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 616 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 6.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. Bus width: 352-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 5.5 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 11 GB | 16 GB+45% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 616 GB/s+7% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 352-bit+38% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 72 MB+1209% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti draws 250W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 175W — a 35.3% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 175W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 116mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.1 | 116.1+35% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Codename | TU102 | AD102 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #66 | #16 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












