
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Why buy it
- ✅27.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅82.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌233.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 450W vs 200W.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 205.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 450W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅27.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅82.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 205.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 450W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌233.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 450W vs 200W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3090 Ti better than GeForce RTX 4070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4070 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 608 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 571 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 760 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 586 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 438 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 878 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 807 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 710 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 700 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 640 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 560 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 466 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 331 FPS | 272 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti scores 29,395 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti leads by 9.2%. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 336 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,395+9% | 26,919 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+83% | 5888 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40 TFLOPS+37% | 29.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1860 MHz | 2475 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 336+83% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+81% | 5.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 36 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+83% | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 336+83% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+100% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s+100% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 36 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti draws 450W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 76.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 336mm vs 304mm, occupying 3 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 200W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 650W-24% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 336mm | 304mm |
| Height | 140mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 3 | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 65.3 | 134.6+106% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 70% less ($1400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 205.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $599-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 44.9+205% |
| Codename | GA102 | AD104 |
| Release | January 27 2022 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #19 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












