
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018Why buy it
- ✅195.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (544 vs 184).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌66.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.5 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅7.4% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 108.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 544), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅195.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (544 vs 184).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅7.4% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 108.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌66.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.5 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 544), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2080 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 866 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 703 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 534 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 272 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,513 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti scores 21,513 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 25.1%. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 13.45 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 68 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 544 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 21,513 | 26,919+25% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 5888+35% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.45 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+117% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 2475 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 88+38% | 64 |
| TMUs | 272+48% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 5.8 MB+35% |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 36 MB+555% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 68+48% | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 544+196% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti comes with 11 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 9.1% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 616 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 22.2% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. Bus width: 352-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 5.5 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 11 GB | 12 GB+9% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 616 GB/s+22% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 352-bit+83% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 36 MB+555% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 200W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 116mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.1 | 134.6+56% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti launched at $999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 40% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 108.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $599-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5 | 44.9+109% |
| Codename | TU102 | AD104 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #66 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












