
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 285W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 285mm, a 50mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 15 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅106.6% more average FPS across 15 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌220.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌119.2% higher power demand at 285W vs 130W.
- ❌21.3% longer card at 285mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 285W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 285mm, a 50mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅106.6% more average FPS across 15 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 15 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌220.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌119.2% higher power demand at 285W vs 130W.
- ❌21.3% longer card at 285mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 165.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 80 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 31,578+166% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 7680+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+346% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2610 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 80 | 240+200% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 7.5 MB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 60+200% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 240+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 504 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 74.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-54% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-36% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 285mm |
| Height | 124mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 110.8+21% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 68.8% less ($550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 21% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-69% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+21% | 39.5 |
| Codename | GA106 | AD104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













