GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022Core: 1515 MHzBoost: 1755 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023Core: 720 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 361.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

  • 11.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 702.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Yes. RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 11.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 73.8% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 192 vs 80 Tensor cores. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2022, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022, 73.8% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is about 702.8% more expensive on MSRP at $1,999 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 11.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 73.8% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $249 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
1080p
low130 FPS102 FPS
medium113 FPS87 FPS
high99 FPS70 FPS
ultra83 FPS48 FPS
1440p
low119 FPS81 FPS
medium96 FPS68 FPS
high81 FPS49 FPS
ultra69 FPS33 FPS
4K
low64 FPS33 FPS
medium57 FPS30 FPS
high39 FPS22 FPS
ultra33 FPS20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
1080p
low239 FPS268 FPS
medium206 FPS213 FPS
high164 FPS171 FPS
ultra128 FPS148 FPS
1440p
low163 FPS198 FPS
medium135 FPS151 FPS
high112 FPS123 FPS
ultra92 FPS100 FPS
4K
low88 FPS91 FPS
medium74 FPS72 FPS
high62 FPS62 FPS
ultra49 FPS48 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
1080p
low535 FPS465 FPS
medium428 FPS404 FPS
high357 FPS341 FPS
ultra268 FPS288 FPS
1440p
low401 FPS339 FPS
medium321 FPS295 FPS
high268 FPS256 FPS
ultra201 FPS208 FPS
4K
low268 FPS229 FPS
medium214 FPS192 FPS
high178 FPS150 FPS
ultra134 FPS113 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
1080p
low467 FPS166 FPS
medium414 FPS136 FPS
high335 FPS117 FPS
ultra268 FPS100 FPS
1440p
low372 FPS121 FPS
medium321 FPS102 FPS
high236 FPS89 FPS
ultra197 FPS75 FPS
4K
low199 FPS73 FPS
medium175 FPS61 FPS
high150 FPS48 FPS
ultra125 FPS37 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 20,669 — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation leads by 73.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) with 80 Tensor cores vs 192.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score
11,892
20,669+74%
Architecture
Ampere
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
8 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2560
6144+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS
19.17 TFLOPS+113%
Boost Clock
1755 MHz+13%
1560 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
80
192+140%
L1 Cache
2.5 MB
6 MB+140%
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB+2300%
Ray Tracing Cores
20
48+140%
Tensor Cores
80
192+140%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 25% advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6 ECC
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
280 GB/s+25%
Bus Width
128-bit
160-bit+25%
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB+2300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 60% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
TDP
130W
70W-46%
Recommended PSU
450W-40%
750W
Power Connector
8-pin
1x 8-pin
Length
235mm
267mm
Height
124mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
91.5
295.3+223%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 87.5% less ($1750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 364.1% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP
$249-88%
$1999
Performance per Dollar
47.8+364%
10.3
Codename
GA106
AD104
Release
January 4 2022
March 21 2023
Ranking
#224
#71