
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 140W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅58.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 10.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.3 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅45.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 192).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 140W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 140W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅58.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 10.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.3 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅45.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 192).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 140W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell better than RTX 4000 Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 4000 Ada Generation make more sense than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 418 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 117 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 315 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 270 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 Ada Generation and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 24,046 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 26,498 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 10.2%. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2055 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) with 192 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,046 | 26,498+10% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 8960+46% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 26.73 TFLOPS | 36.83 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2055 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 192 | 280+46% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 8.8 MB+47% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 70+46% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 280+46% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — a 20% advantage for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 24 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 432 GB/s+20% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 192-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation draws 70W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 140W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-50% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 343.5+81% | 189.3 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 13.3 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell offers 10.8% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.0 | 13.3+11% |
| Codename | AD104 | GB203 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #47 | #48 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












