
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
2021Why buy it
- ✅32.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 223.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.9 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌314.3% higher power demand at 290W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 290W, a 220W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌233.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 38.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
2021RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅32.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 223.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.9 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 290W, a 220W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌314.3% higher power demand at 290W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌233.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 38.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3070 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 97 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 880 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 709 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 616 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 520 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 486 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 267 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 123 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 290W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,295 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti scores 23,295 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation reaches 24,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 192 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,295 | 24,046+3% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+13% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 608 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 68.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 608 GB/s+69% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+60% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti draws 290W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 122.2% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 290W | 70W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C-3% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 80.3 | 343.5+328% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti launched at $599 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti costs 70% less ($1400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.9 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti offers 224.2% better value. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-70% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.9+224% | 12.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | AD104 |
| Release | May 31 2021 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #50 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












