GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

2021Core: 1575 MHzBoost: 1770 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

2023Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

2021

Why buy it

  • 14.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (23,295 vs 25,267).
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 152.2% higher power demand at 290W vs 115W.
  • 154.3% longer card at 267mm vs 105mm.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

2023

Why buy it

  • +8.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
  • More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 115W instead of 290W, a 175W reduction.
  • Measures 105mm instead of 267mm, a 162mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3070 Ti better than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 14.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 8.5% higher PassMark G3D performance, DLSS 2 Super Resolution, and 192 vs 160 Tensor cores. It also comes from 2021 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021, 8.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 8 GB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of DLSS Super Resolution. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $599 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 14.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (23,295 vs 25,267). It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (115W vs 290W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti?
Yes. RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (115W vs 290W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3070 Ti currently gives you a lower G3D Mark (23,295 vs 25,267) and 14.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3070 TiRTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low160 FPS141 FPS
medium143 FPS122 FPS
high125 FPS104 FPS
ultra105 FPS73 FPS
1440p
low135 FPS113 FPS
medium110 FPS94 FPS
high96 FPS73 FPS
ultra86 FPS51 FPS
4K
low81 FPS50 FPS
medium69 FPS44 FPS
high55 FPS32 FPS
ultra47 FPS27 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3070 TiRTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low495 FPS370 FPS
medium424 FPS316 FPS
high351 FPS250 FPS
ultra299 FPS213 FPS
1440p
low300 FPS277 FPS
medium249 FPS230 FPS
high220 FPS182 FPS
ultra185 FPS146 FPS
4K
low139 FPS130 FPS
medium118 FPS111 FPS
high103 FPS92 FPS
ultra82 FPS68 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3070 TiRTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low880 FPS826 FPS
medium709 FPS679 FPS
high616 FPS612 FPS
ultra524 FPS538 FPS
1440p
low692 FPS628 FPS
medium558 FPS510 FPS
high474 FPS451 FPS
ultra393 FPS391 FPS
4K
low479 FPS405 FPS
medium388 FPS323 FPS
high331 FPS264 FPS
ultra262 FPS209 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3070 TiRTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low595 FPS287 FPS
medium520 FPS248 FPS
high428 FPS205 FPS
ultra380 FPS179 FPS
1440p
low486 FPS228 FPS
medium429 FPS200 FPS
high336 FPS167 FPS
ultra294 FPS142 FPS
4K
low290 FPS140 FPS
medium267 FPS118 FPS
high236 FPS95 FPS
ultra198 FPS78 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 290W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,295 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,267 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti scores 23,295 versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 25,267 — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU leads by 8.5%. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 192 Tensor cores vs 160.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3070 TiRTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score
23,295
25,267+8%
Architecture
Ampere
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
8 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
6144+20%
5120
Compute (TFLOPS)
21.75 TFLOPS+37%
15.82 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1770 MHz+18%
1500 MHz
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
192+20%
160
L1 Cache
6 MB+20%
5 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
48 MB+1100%
Ray Tracing Cores
48+20%
40
Tensor Cores
192+20%
160

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3070 TiRTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 608 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 40.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3070 TiRTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
12 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
608 GB/s+41%
432 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+33%
192-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB
48 MB+1100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3070 TiRTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3070 TiRTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Encoder
NVENC 7th gen
NVENC 8th Gen
Decoder
NVDEC 5th gen
NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9
H.264,H.265,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti draws 290W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 115W — a 86.4% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 650W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3070 TiRTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
TDP
290W
115W-60%
Recommended PSU
750W
650W-13%
Power Connector
2x 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
105mm
Height
112mm
82mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
78°C-8%
85
Perf/Watt
80.3
219.7+174%
💰

Value Analysis

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3070 TiRTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
MSRP
$599
Codename
GA104
AD104
Release
May 31 2021
March 21 2023
Ranking
#50
#81