
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
2021Why buy it
- ✅14.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (23,295 vs 25,267).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌152.2% higher power demand at 290W vs 115W.
- ❌154.3% longer card at 267mm vs 105mm.
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+8.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 290W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 105mm instead of 267mm, a 162mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
2021RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅14.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅+8.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 290W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 105mm instead of 267mm, a 162mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (23,295 vs 25,267).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌152.2% higher power demand at 290W vs 115W.
- ❌154.3% longer card at 267mm vs 105mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 Ti better than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 880 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 709 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 616 FPS | 612 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 538 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 209 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 520 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 486 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 267 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 78 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 290W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,295 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,267 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti scores 23,295 versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 25,267 — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU leads by 8.5%. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 192 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,295 | 25,267+8% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+20% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+37% | 15.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+18% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+20% | 5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+20% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 192+20% | 160 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 608 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 40.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 608 GB/s+41% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti draws 290W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 115W — a 86.4% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 650W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 290W | 115W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 105mm |
| Height | 112mm | 82mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C-8% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 80.3 | 219.7+174% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | AD104 |
| Release | May 31 2021 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #50 | #81 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












