
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 6800 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅43.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,350 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 220.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.5 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌208% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 38.5 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6800 XT
2020RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅43.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,350 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 220.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.5 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌208% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 38.5 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6800 XT better than RTX 4000 Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 4000 Ada Generation make more sense than Radeon RX 6800 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 565 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 477 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 97 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 924 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 767 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 683 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 562 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 714 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 412 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 552 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 466 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 355 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 252 FPS | 123 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6800 XT and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT
The Radeon RX 6800 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,995 points. Launch price was $649.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 24,995 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation reaches 24,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6800 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 20.74 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,995+4% | 24,046 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 6144+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.74 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 2250 MHz+44% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+50% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+50% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 6800 XT is on a newer tier with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6800 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6800 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 6800 XT offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 42.2% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800 XT. Bus width: 256-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+700% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+42% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+60% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6800 XT draws 300W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 124.3% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 70W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 120mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 83.3 | 343.5+312% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6800 XT launched at $649 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. The Radeon RX 6800 XT costs 67.5% less ($1350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.5 (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the Radeon RX 6800 XT offers 220.8% better value. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649-68% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.5+221% | 12.0 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | AD104 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #42 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












