
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:

RTX A5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,722 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 95% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 230W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A5000
2021Why buy it
- ✅52.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 192).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌86.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,721 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 230W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023RTX A5000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,722 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 95% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 230W, a 160W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅52.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 192).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌86.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,721 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 230W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation better than RTX A5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 418 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 893 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 516 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 315 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 480 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 81 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 Ada Generation and RTX A5000

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.

RTX A5000
RTX A5000
The RTX A5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,951 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 24,046 and the RTX A5000 reaches 22,951 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A5000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 8,192 (RTX A5000). Raw compute: 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A5000). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 64 (RTX A5000) with 192 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,046+5% | 22,951 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 8192+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 26.73 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1695 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 192 | 256+33% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 8 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 64+33% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 256+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A5000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A5000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5000 has 24 GB. The RTX A5000 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5000) — a 113.3% advantage for the RTX A5000. Bus width: 160-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 6 MB (RTX A5000) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 24 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 768 GB/s+113% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 384-bit+140% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 12.1 (RTX A5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5000).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation draws 70W versus the RTX A5000's 230W — a 106.7% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 650W (RTX A5000). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-70% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 343.5+244% | 99.8 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999 MSRP, while the RTX A5000 launched at $3721. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation costs 46.3% less ($1722 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 6.2 (RTX A5000) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation offers 93.5% better value. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999-46% | $3721 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.0+94% | 6.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #47 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












