
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌123.8% longer card at 235mm vs 105mm.
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅49.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 80).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 105mm instead of 235mm, a 130mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅49.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 80).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 105mm instead of 235mm, a 130mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌123.8% longer card at 235mm vs 105mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 612 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 538 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 209 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 78 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,267 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 25,267 — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU leads by 112.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 80 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 25,267+112% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5120+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 15.82 TFLOPS+76% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+17% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 5 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 40+100% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 160+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 92.9% advantage for the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 432 GB/s+93% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 115W — a 12.2% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 115W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 105mm |
| Height | 124mm | 82mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 219.7+140% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | AD104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #81 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













