
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 170W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅97.9% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 250mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌41.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 120W.
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 170W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅97.9% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 250mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌41.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than GeForce GTX 1060 3GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 3GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 3GB and GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB scores 9,815 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 73.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1708 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,815 | 16,995+73% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 3584+211% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.935 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+224% |
| Boost Clock | 1708 MHz | 1777 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 72 | 112+56% |
| L1 Cache | 0.42 MB | 3.5 MB+733% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 87.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 12 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 360 GB/s+88% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 34.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-29% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-27% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 250mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 81.8 | 100.0+22% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB launched at $199 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB costs 39.5% less ($130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 49.3 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 4.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-40% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.3 | 51.7+5% |
| Codename | GP106 | GA106 |
| Release | August 18 2016 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #272 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













