
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 120W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅17.1% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060 3GB: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 120W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅17.1% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060 3GB: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 120W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 120W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) better than GeForce GTX 1060 3GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 3GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 44 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 88 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 80 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 3GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB scores 9,815 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) reaches 10,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Raw compute: 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1708 MHz vs 1485 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,815 | 10,119+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+13% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.935 TFLOPS+29% | 3.041 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1708 MHz+15% | 1485 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+13% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.42 MB | 1 MB+138% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile). Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) — the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 6 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 288 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB draws 120W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)'s 50W — a 82.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 50W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 250mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 81.8 | 202.4+147% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Codename | GP106 | TU116 |
| Release | August 18 2016 | April 23 2020 |
| Ranking | #272 | #324 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













