
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
2017Why buy it
- ✅29.6% more average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅29.6% more average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design better than GeForce GTX 1060 3GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1060 3GB make more sense than GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 111 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 3GB and GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1379 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,842 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB scores 9,815 and the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design reaches 9,842 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 2,048 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 5.648 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1708 MHz vs 1379 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,815 | 9,842 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 2048+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.935 TFLOPS | 5.648 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 1708 MHz+24% | 1379 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 72 | 128+78% |
| L1 Cache | 432 KB | 768 KB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 8 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 256 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB draws 120W versus the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design's 115W — a 4.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 115W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 250mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.8 | 85.6+5% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Codename | GP106 | GP104 |
| Release | August 18 2016 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #272 | #358 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













