
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile better than GeForce GTX 1060 3GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 3GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 33 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 3GB and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1035 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,080 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB scores 9,815 and the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile reaches 10,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Raw compute: 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 5.299 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Boost clocks: 1708 MHz vs 1035 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,815 | 10,080+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 2560+122% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.935 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1708 MHz+65% | 1035 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 72 | 80+11% |
| L1 Cache | 0.42 MB | 2.5 MB+495% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 8 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile's 75W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 250mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 75W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 250mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.8 | 134.4+64% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Codename | GP106 | GA106 |
| Release | August 18 2016 | May 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #272 | #262 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













