
GeForce GTX 970
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 970
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅130.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 73.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 29.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
GeForce GTX 970
2014GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅130.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 73.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 29.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 970?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 970 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 290 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 195 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970
The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 970 scores 9,640 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 110.7%. The GeForce GTX 970 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,640 | 20,312+111% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1664 | 4864+192% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.92 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+313% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1665 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 56 | 80+43% |
| TMUs | 104 | 152+46% |
| L1 Cache | 0.61 MB | 4.8 MB+687% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 970 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 970 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 970) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo VP6 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP6 | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 970 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 970) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 64.3 | 101.6+58% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 970 launched at $329 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce GTX 970 costs 17.5% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.3 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 73.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-18% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3 | 50.9+74% |
| Codename | GM204 | GA104 |
| Release | September 19 2014 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #269 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













