
GeForce GTX 970
Popular choices:

GRID P40-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 970
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,370 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1642.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.3 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GRID P40-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1632.2% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 29.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
GeForce GTX 970
2014GRID P40-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,370 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1642.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.3 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1632.2% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 29.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 970 better than GRID P40-2Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GRID P40-2Q make more sense than GeForce GTX 970?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 108 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970 and GRID P40-2Q

GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970
The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.

GRID P40-2Q
GRID P40-2Q
The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970 scores 9,640 and the GRID P40-2Q reaches 9,581 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID P40-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q). Raw compute: 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,640 | 9,581 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1664 | 2048+23% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.92 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 56 | 64+14% |
| TMUs | 104 | 128+23% |
| L1 Cache | 624 KB | 768 KB+23% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 970 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P40-2Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970) vs 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q). Decoder: PureVideo VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970 draws 150W versus the GRID P40-2Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 970 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 970) vs 500W (GRID P40-2Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 64.3+51% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 970 launched at $329 MSRP, while the GRID P40-2Q launched at $5699. The GeForce GTX 970 costs 94.2% less ($5370 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.3 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 1.7 (GRID P40-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 970 offers 1623.5% better value. The GRID P40-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-94% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3+1624% | 1.7 |
| Codename | GM204 | GM204 |
| Release | September 19 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #269 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













