
GeForce GTX 970
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 970
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌32.1% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅22.7% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 29.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 970
2014GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅22.7% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 29.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌32.1% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB better than GeForce GTX 970?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 970 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 85 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970 and GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970
The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,063 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970 scores 9,640 and the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB reaches 10,063 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Raw compute: 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970) vs 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1709 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,640 | 10,063+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1664+30% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.92 TFLOPS | 4.375 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1709 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 56+17% | 48 |
| TMUs | 104+30% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 624 KB+30% | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 970 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 970. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 970) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) — the GeForce GTX 970 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+17% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12 (FL 12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970) vs NVENC 4th gen (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Decoder: PureVideo VP6 vs PureVideo VP7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | NVENC 4th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP6 | PureVideo VP7 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB's 120W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 970) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 250mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 120W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 250mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 64.3 | 83.9+30% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 970 launched at $329 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB launched at $249. The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB costs 24.3% less ($80 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.3 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) — the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB offers 37.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $249-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3 | 40.4+38% |
| Codename | GM204 | GP106 |
| Release | September 19 2014 | July 19 2016 |
| Ranking | #269 | #255 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













