
GeForce GTX 970
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 Fury
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 970
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.3 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 275W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌36.9% longer card at 267mm vs 195mm.
Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 195mm instead of 267mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌66.9% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 29.3 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 150W.
GeForce GTX 970
2014Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.3 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 275W, a 125W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 195mm instead of 267mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌36.9% longer card at 267mm vs 195mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌66.9% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 29.3 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 970 better than Radeon R9 Fury?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 Fury make more sense than GeForce GTX 970?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 107 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 42 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970 and Radeon R9 Fury

GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970
The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon R9 Fury
Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970 scores 9,640 and the Radeon R9 Fury reaches 9,521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,640+1% | 9,521 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1664 | 3584+115% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.92 TFLOPS | 7.168 TFLOPS+83% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+18% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 56 | 64+14% |
| TMUs | 104 | 224+115% |
| L1 Cache | 624 KB | 896 KB+44% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 970 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Fury relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury) — a 128.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury. Bus width: 256-bit vs 4096-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 512 GB/s+129% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 4096-bit+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: PureVideo VP6 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP6 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 58.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 970 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 970) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-45% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 195mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 64.3+86% | 34.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 970 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury launched at $549. The GeForce GTX 970 costs 40.1% less ($220 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.3 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 17.3 (Radeon R9 Fury) — the GeForce GTX 970 offers 69.4% better value. The Radeon R9 Fury is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-40% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3+69% | 17.3 |
| Codename | GM204 | Fiji |
| Release | September 19 2014 | July 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #269 | #274 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













