
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Tesla T10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 660.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 260W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌703.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 260W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 660.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 260W, a 130W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌703.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 260W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla T10 better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Tesla T10?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Tesla T10

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Tesla T10
Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Tesla T10's 12,558 — the Tesla T10 leads by 5.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 12,558+6% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 14.38 TFLOPS+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+13% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 288+260% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla T10 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-50% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+89% | 48.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla T10 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 87.5% less ($1751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6.3 (Tesla T10) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 658.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-88% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+659% | 6.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | TU102 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #224 | #213 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













