
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Tesla P4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+32.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 430.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
- ❌39.9% longer card at 235mm vs 168mm.
Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 235mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,004 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+32.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 430.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 235mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
- ❌39.9% longer card at 235mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,004 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Tesla P4?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla P4 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 45 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 101 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 38 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Tesla P4

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Tesla P4
Tesla P4
The Tesla P4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 886 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,004 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Tesla P4's 9,004 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 32.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Tesla P4 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,560 (Tesla P4). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5.704 TFLOPS (Tesla P4). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+32% | 9,004 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+58% | 5.704 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+58% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+166% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla P4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P4 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Tesla P4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 6.0 (Tesla P4). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Tesla P4).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Tesla P4's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The Tesla P4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Tesla P4). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 75W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 168mm |
| Height | 124mm | 53mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 120.1+31% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla P4 launched at $1000. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 75.1% less ($751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 9.0 (Tesla P4) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 431.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-75% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+431% | 9.0 |
| Codename | GA106 | GP104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #224 | #293 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













