
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Tesla M6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+91% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 667.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
- ❌23400% longer card at 235mm vs 1mm.
Tesla M6
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 235mm, a 234mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,225 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Tesla M6
2015Why buy it
- ✅+91% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 667.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 235mm, a 234mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
- ❌23400% longer card at 235mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,225 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Tesla M6?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M6 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Tesla M6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Tesla M6
Tesla M6
The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Tesla M6's 6,225 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 91%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1180 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+91% | 6,225 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+67% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+148% | 3.625 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+49% | 1180 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+346% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M6 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M6 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 (Tesla M6). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M6). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 5th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 26.1% difference. The Tesla M6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 100W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 1mm |
| Height | 124mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+47% | 62.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 75.1% less ($751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6.2 (Tesla M6) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 671% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-75% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+671% | 6.2 |
| Codename | GA106 | GM204 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #224 | #388 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













