
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Tesla C2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+281% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2193.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla C2070
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,121 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌502% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Tesla C2070
2011Why buy it
- ✅+281% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2193.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,121 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌502% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Tesla C2070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla C2070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 35 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 35 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Tesla C2070

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Tesla C2070
Tesla C2070
The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Tesla C2070's 3,121 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 281%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Tesla C2070 uses Fermi, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 448 (Tesla C2070). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+281% | 3,121 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+471% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+774% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80+43% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+184% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla C2070 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2070 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2070) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | — |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | — |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Tesla C2070's 238W — a 58.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (Tesla C2070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 248mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-45% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 248mm |
| Height | 124mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+598% | 13.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla C2070 launched at $1499. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 83.4% less ($1250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2.1 (Tesla C2070) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 2176.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-83% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+2176% | 2.1 |
| Codename | GA106 | GF100 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #224 | #575 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













