
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+55.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 118.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
- ❌50.6% longer card at 235mm vs 156mm.
T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 235mm, a 79mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,649 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌40.6% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅+55.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 118.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 235mm, a 79mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
- ❌50.6% longer card at 235mm vs 156mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,649 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌40.6% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than T1000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is T1000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 66 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and T1000

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

T1000
T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the T1000's 7,649 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 55.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+55% | 7,649 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+186% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+259% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+26% | 1395 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+43% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+184% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T1000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the T1000 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1 MB (T1000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the T1000's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 50W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 156mm |
| Height | 124mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 153.0+67% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the T1000 launched at $350. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 28.9% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 21.9 (T1000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 118.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-29% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+118% | 21.9 |
| Codename | GA106 | TU117 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #224 | #333 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













