
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 979.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅140.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅450% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 80).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2710.8% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 979.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅140.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅450% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 80).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2710.8% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 199 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 931 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 305 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 963 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 774 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 697 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 748 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 520 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 2377 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,968 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 30,968 — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell leads by 160.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 14,080 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 66.94 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2377 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 110 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) with 80 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 30,968+160% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 14080+450% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 66.94 TFLOPS+645% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2377 MHz+35% |
| ROPs | 32 | 176+450% |
| TMUs | 80 | 440+450% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 13.8 MB+452% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 96 MB+4700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 110+450% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 440+450% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — a 357.1% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 96 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+357% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 96 MB+4700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 300W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-57% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 103.2+13% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell launched at $6999. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 96.4% less ($6750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4.4 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 986.4% better value. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-96% | $6999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+986% | 4.4 |
| Codename | GA106 | GB202 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #224 | #13 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













