
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅28.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
- ❌186.6% longer card at 235mm vs 82mm.
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 235mm, a 153mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅28.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 235mm, a 153mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
- ❌186.6% longer card at 235mm vs 82mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than RTX A1000 Embedded GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A1000 Embedded GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 11,009 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1140 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 16 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) with 80 Tensor cores vs 64.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+8% | 11,009 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+92% | 4.669 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+54% | 1140 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+25% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+25% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 80+25% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 115.2% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 35W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 82mm |
| Height | 124mm | 4mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 314.5+244% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













