
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,001 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 285.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 210W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4500 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4500 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅122.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 80).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌803.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 210W vs 130W.
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022RTX 4500 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,001 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 285.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 210W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅122.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 80).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4500 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4500 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌803.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 210W vs 130W.
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4500 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 167 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 931 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 572 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 499 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 914 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 763 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 313 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RTX 4500 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2070 MHz to 2580 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,850 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RTX 4500 Ada Generation's 27,850 — the RTX 4500 Ada Generation leads by 134.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 7,680 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 39.63 TFLOPS (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2580 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 60 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) with 80 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 27,850+134% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 7680+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 39.63 TFLOPS+341% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2580 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 80 | 240+200% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 7.5 MB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 60+200% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 240+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation has 24 GB. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 448 GB/s (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — a 100% advantage for the RTX 4500 Ada Generation. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 MB (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4500 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RTX 4500 Ada Generation's 210W — a 47.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-38% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 132.6+45% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation launched at $2250. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 88.9% less ($2001 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.4 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 285.5% better value. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-89% | $2250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+285% | 12.4 |
| Codename | GA106 | AD103 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #27 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













