
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 361.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅11.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌702.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 361.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅11.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌702.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 37 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 20,669 — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation leads by 73.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) with 80 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 20,669+74% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+113% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+13% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 192+140% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 6 MB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 48+140% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 192+140% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 25% advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 280 GB/s+25% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 60% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 70W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-40% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 295.3+223% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 87.5% less ($1750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 364.1% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-88% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+364% | 10.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | AD104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #71 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













