
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 297% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅28.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌702.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 297% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅28.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌702.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 97 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 123 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads by 102.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 80 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 24,046+102% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+197% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+13% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 192+140% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 6 MB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 48+140% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 192+140% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 60.7% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 360 GB/s+61% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 60% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 70W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-40% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 343.5+275% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 87.5% less ($1750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 298.3% better value. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-88% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+298% | 12.0 |
| Codename | GA106 | AD104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













