
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $376 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 27.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 88), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅31.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅10% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (88 vs 80).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌151% HIGHER MSRP$625 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($625 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $376 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 27.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅31.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅10% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (88 vs 80).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 88), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌151% HIGHER MSRP$625 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($625 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 2000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 68 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 59 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 733 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 164 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 193 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RTX 2000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,147 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation's 17,147 — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation leads by 44.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) with 80 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 17,147+44% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2816+10% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2130 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80 | 88+10% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 2.8 MB+12% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 22+10% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 88+10% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 16 GB. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — a 14.3% advantage for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 256 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 60% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 70W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 167mm |
| Height | 124mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 245.0+168% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation launched at $625. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 60.2% less ($376 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 27.4 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 74.5% better value. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-60% | $625 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+74% | 27.4 |
| Codename | GA106 | AD107 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #224 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













